Hello freiends
Here i am sharing my blog about deconstruction and post structuralism .
What is Deconstruction ?
Deconstruction applied in the criticism of literature , designates a theory and practice of reading which questions and climes to " subvet " or "undermine " the assumption that the system of language provides grounds that are adequate to establish the boundaries , the cohrrence or unity , and the determinate meaning of a literary text.
For example in the Purpose which is written by T P Kailasam who was took this story from Mahabharata . In Mahabharata we can see that Eklavya charecter is a marginlised and he has no power and we can see that how to Kailasm change in the Purpose this charecter and he trys to shows that Eklavya was a very powerfull not subaltern but In this Mahabharata this charecter is subaltern .so we can say that there is decontrct this idea because of post structuralist critic views that is no 'a texual origin ' .
Thank you ...
Here i am sharing my blog about deconstruction and post structuralism .
What is Deconstruction ?
Deconstruction applied in the criticism of literature , designates a theory and practice of reading which questions and climes to " subvet " or "undermine " the assumption that the system of language provides grounds that are adequate to establish the boundaries , the cohrrence or unity , and the determinate meaning of a literary text.
According to Derrida, the term Deconstruction is very hard to define as it has no exact meaning at all. Deconstruction, as applied in the criticism of literature, designates a theory and practice of reading which questions and claims to "subvert" or "undermine" the assumption that the system of language provides grounds that are adequate to establish the boundaries, the coherence or unity, and the determinate meanings of a literary text. Typically, a deconstruction reading sets out to show that conflicting forces within the text itself serve to dissipate the seeming definiteness of its structure and meanings into an indefinite array of incompatible and undecidable possibilities.
For example in the Purpose which is written by T P Kailasam who was took this story from Mahabharata . In Mahabharata we can see that Eklavya charecter is a marginlised and he has no power and we can see that how to Kailasm change in the Purpose this charecter and he trys to shows that Eklavya was a very powerfull not subaltern but In this Mahabharata this charecter is subaltern .so we can say that there is decontrct this idea because of post structuralist critic views that is no 'a texual origin ' .
Thank you ...
No comments:
Post a Comment